![]() ![]() The article point out the cons about WG which they have great valid points. This article I been reading up provides a great insight about WG. Because of past experience of how product can be a great at marketing but fail at the execution. People been praising WG like it the huge VPN revolution, those kind of praising concerns me. This post lead me to read up about OpenVPN and WireGuard, it is interesting to read how much people dissing OpenVPN and praising WireGuard even the developer of WG strongly recommend not to use it for production. ![]() However, the wireguard testing is significantly faster (but potentially unsecure). Do you guys have any thoughts on that? Does this mean we should start looking into it? Btw, the OpenVPN testing with them and Air are very close with speed tests. So it appears that in the past four days they have removed that, I am not sure why. ![]() The last time it was on there was August 24th of this month: It no longer says "Do not rely on this code". So I decided to go look at the wireguard project page. Internal IP-address used by the WireGuard servers. Then consider using multihop, the exit server will then only see an If you wish to hide your own public IP-address from the exit server, Seconds on the WireGuard servers, this removes any public IP or stats ofĪmount of data that has been received / sent. We now delete and re-add peers if they have not had a handshake in 180 We set up on our end to ensure the secure level on our wireguard server. The most common question brought up from our user is about the privacyĪnd security issue on Wireguard. We have, and hopefully in the near future, we will cover more locations We are currently installing more wireguard servers in the locations that ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |